With technology getting better and
better every day, and electronics getting more powerful in smaller sizes, we
have to hit a point where we cannot possibly get any better right? The latest
MacBook Air is already so thin and light, yet it is more powerful than the
room-sized computer that was the first computer to be invented. The MacBook Air
obviously does not require as much power as however much power a room-sized
computer requires. How are electronics improving so much, and when will we hit
a brick wall? Superconductors are a significant part of that explanation.
Moore’s Law states (in simple terms)
that every two years electronics will get twice as powerful. This is because
companies manage to fit more transistors (an item in electronics that is on the
nanometer scale) in a tiny space, but soon enough we will reach a point where
we simply cannot shrink their size as we reach the atomic level. So, it seems
that once we cannot keep improving electronics in this way, as we have for so
many years, we will reach our limit. However, superconductors can help us make electronics
more powerful in a slightly different fashion.
A superconductor is a material
(metal or otherwise) that has practically zero electrical losses when carrying
a current (power). This, of course, is very desirable, because less power
losses leads to more efficient electronics that require less power. If
electronics were made with superconducting wires, they would be extremely efficient
compared to electronics today. Who doesn’t want a smartphone with double the
battery life as their current smartphone in the same form factor? All of our
current electronics and their wires lose power constantly, but a superconductor
can carry a current for practically forever. They lose a very small percentage
of power over the span of multiple years! This is a drastic improvement over
modern wires.
Figure 1: An Older Computer by IBM
Jenkins, A. (Photographer). (2010, August 8). IBM JX. Retrieved from https://www.flickr.com/search/?text=first%20computer&license=2%2C3%2C4%2C5%2C6%2C9
Superconductors can be useful in
much more than just wires, though. They can be used as magnets as well in other
ways. A very interesting trait of superconducting magnets is that they can
levitate below a magnet through attraction to the top magnet, rather than simply
levitating over a magnet through repulsion away from the lower magnet (as
current magnets do). MAGLEV (magnetic levitation) trains are very fast, highly efficient,
and work through magnets levitating from repulsion. Imagine what crazy
inventions we might get when engineers find a use for this superconducting
levitation below a magnet. Some possible applications of superconductors include
more efficient and powerful computers, better MAGLEV trains, and better boat
engines (Lundy, Swartzendruber, Bennett, 1989). Naturally, you have to wonder
why we are not using superconductors universally right now. That’s where it
gets a bit tricky.
Common metals used as wires or in
electronics, such as copper, can become superconductors at certain
temperatures, because of some complex chemistry and physics. However, those
temperatures are extremely cold, and they are far from room temperature. For
example, mercury wire is a superconductor but at -452F. This critical
temperature changes depending on the material. A rare-earth material called
YBCO was discovered in 1987 to be a superconductor at -292F. This is a much
better temperature than mercury wire but still a very cold critical
temperature. One of the least cold critical temperatures of -231F was found in
a non-rare earth compound in 1988, and this compound was more stable as well.
These extremely low temperatures are achieved using liquid nitrogen, which is
cold enough for these tests to be done. As a result, more testing needs to be
done to find materials that are superconductors at more reasonable temperatures
to be used in our day to day electronics. Temperature, though, is not the only
obstacle in bringing superconductors into modern devices (Lundy,
Swartzendruber, Bennett, 1989).
Ceramics are the superconductors
with the warmest known critical temperatures (around -200F), but they are
brittle. Even if they did have critical temperatures around 80F, they would need
to be strong enough to use in our devices. One of the factors in the strength
of a ceramic superconductor is its shape. The problem lies in finding shapes
for the ceramics that will allow them to be useful in devices while also making
them strong. This is not so easy when circuits are generally small, and the
ceramics have to be small as well to fit in them. Temperature and material
strength are two of the most significant issues with creating usable
superconductors (Lundy, Swartzendruber, Bennett, 1989).
So, if and when we do manage to
make room temperature superconductors a reality, what can we expect? Some uses
are up to 40% lifetime savings in huge generators, which is a substantial
economic saving, even better, more powerful MacBooks and iPhones with much
longer battery lives. Other applications are smaller and quieter boat motors,
even more efficient MAGLEV trains, superconducting magnets, and a large amount
of medical applications (Lundy, Swartzendruber, Bennett, 1989). These are the
types of things that make the future a reality, and they should come around sooner
or later.
By: Nicolas Chaparro, University of Florida
References:
Lundy, D. R., Swartzendruber, L. J., & Bennett, L. H.
(1989). A Brief Review of Recent Superconductivity Research at NIST. Journal
of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, 94(3),
147–178. doi:10.6028/jres.094.018
Hi Nico. I found your blogpost to be very interesting. I often find myself wondering what our future holds in terms of technology, and simply cannot imagine us getting any better than what we have now. I thought it was very interesting how there are all these different metals that we can potentially use to even further our technological advancements. I think you did a great job explaining everything. I am someone who knows absolutely nothing about this topic, and still felt that I could follow along. The only question I have is: how long until we will have to turn to other metals in order to advance our technology?
ReplyDeleteVery interesting topic, I am usually not very tech savvy or understand much about how technology works, but it was not difficult for me to understand the content of your article. I enjoyed how managed to take very complex scientific information and metals and conductors, and translate it to an audience for people like me to understand with no knowledge base in the field. It's incredible to see the potential our future holds with regards to technology, especially when I thought we couldn't get much better. Nice work!
ReplyDeleteI really like this question that you are asking. What does come next for the future of technology? Like you said, there has to be some point that there is no new technology to bring out. I have often thought of my iphone. I have the largest iphone that Apple has come out with and it just so happens that it is the most recent launch. To have a bigger phone is a nice commodity because you can see everything better, but at some point the larger and larger they become the less portable they become. I like how you described the significance of superconductors because with this new technology one could not know just how many innovations can be made. Ground breaking medical advancements could be just one of these innovations.
ReplyDeleteFor this article, I found myself struggling to really know what the topic was about until I got further into the reading so my one suggestion would be to explain what exactly you would be talking about so that you can captivate your reader from the beginning, making them want to read more and more on what you have written. Overall, the article is interesting and informing. While presenting with juxtaposition, readers are able to understand the drastic difference between the 1940's and today, making the growth that much more important and meaningful.
ReplyDeleteI really found this article interesting as I have always wondered about our future. I do believe we will hit a brick wall, but human nature always finds a way to improve. I have heard of super conducters and their potential and you provided great background that I didn't know before. What about beyond the super conducters though? I feel like it will get to a point where we will eventually find a limitless energy source but I could just be going over the top.
ReplyDelete